Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs
Here are some extracts from the Lords debate. I’ve taken the quotes from the Press Association wires.
Lord Krebs said his amendment was necessary because existing environmental protections in the bill were too weak. He said:
We have heard many times that the purpose of the Bill is to ensure that everything is the same the day after Brexit as it was the day before.
Yet for environmental protection things will not be the same. We’re talking about the protection of our air quality, our water quality, rivers, oceans, habitats and biodiversity.
I believe I am speaking up for this House and for the country. To set ourselves up in such a disreputable way as guardians of wisdom and the common good when so many of the amendments we have passed have simply been an attempt to wreck the Bill and thwart the will of the people is both false and dangerous.
This is a chance for us to vote seriously for the future, to do here what we have done 10 years ago with the Climate Change Act, which this House would never dream of saying was other than a success.
If the prime minister is right and we want a world-class watchdog and we want to set standards for the whole world there is no better way than taking the lessons of the Climate Change Act and putting them here on the face of this Act as the Government actually promised it would.
The irreparable damage that may be done is damage to the environment and our health in the future if we lose the safeguards and protections that we have for our environment …
We are only taking action on these issues because of the prospect of infraction from the EU. If we lose that lever, then we lose the ability to tackle these major environmental issues. It is essential that we insist not just as part of the consultation, but we insist now that part of the powers of a new environmental watchdog must include the ability to take that sort of legal action.
The government has suffered its 15th defeat in the Lords on the EU withdrawal bill. Peers voted by 294 to 244 – a majority of 50 – in favour of an amendment to create a watchdog to enforce EU environmental standards after Brexit.