Vote Leave’s Dominic Cummings faces being found guilty of ‘contempt of parliament’ – Politics live

Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen

Nicola Sturgeon has ruled out giving all prison inmates in Scotland the right to vote, rejecting a recommendation from Holyrood’s equalities committee earlier this week.

Sturgeon was pressed to respond to its report at first minister’s questions on Thursday and hinted that she could back limited voting rights, which would not extend to those jailed for the “most serious and heinous crimes.”

I’m not of the view that this should lead to the enfranchising of all prisoners and I am, to say the least, sceptical that complying with the ECHR requires all prisoners to have the right to vote.

Dominic Cummings, campaign director for Vote Leave during the EU referendum campaign, is on course to be found guilty of a contempt of parliament. The Commons culture committee has been asking him to give evidence to its fake news inquiry, he has been saying no (or at least, not now), and today the committee has announced that it will report him to the Commons for contempt of parliament.

But Alexander Nix, the former Cambridge Analytica boss who was also refusing invitations to appear, has now, having been issued with a summons, agreed that he will appear before the committee, on Wednesday 6 June.

We are disappointed that Dominic Cummings has not responded positively to our requests for him to appear. His reasoning that he must delay giving evidence due to ongoing investigations simply does not hold up, considering that Alexander Nix, Jeff Silvester and others involved have agreed to cooperate with the committee’s investigations despite currently being subject to various investigations.

Reporting the matter to the House is a first step which could result in a decision that a contempt of parliament has been committed, a very serious outcome for the individual.

The Houses’ power to punish non-members for contempt is untested in recent times. In theory, both Houses can summon a person to the bar of the House to reprimand them or order a person’s imprisonment. In addition, the House of Lords is regarded as possessing the power to fine non-members. The House of Commons last used its power to fine in 1666 and this power may since have lapsed.

In 1978 the House of Commons resolved to exercise its penal jurisdiction as sparingly as possible and only when satisfied that it was essential to do so in order to provide reasonable protection for the House, its members or its officers from improper obstruction or interference with the performance of their functions. Since that resolution, the Commons has not punished a nonmember. There is no equivalent resolution in the House of Lords, but the House has not punished a non-member since the nineteenth century.

Continue reading…

Most Popular

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem?

Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet.

Copyright © 2017 N24.co.uk. All right reserved.

To Top